<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Wide is a &quot;Share-able&quot; Lane?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mighkwilson.com/2007/11/how-wide-is-a-share-able-lane/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mighkwilson.com/2007/11/how-wide-is-a-share-able-lane/</link>
	<description>Expert Advice for Central Florida Bicycle Users</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 01:49:32 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Keri</title>
		<link>http://mighkwilson.com/2007/11/how-wide-is-a-share-able-lane/comment-page-1/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Keri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 03:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commuteorlando.com/themetester/2007/11/how-wide-is-a-share-able-lane/#comment-48</guid>
		<description>Thanks Mighk! Great explanation. The illustrations are very helpful too.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Regardless of whether or not they WANT to share it, a higher percentage of motorists recognize that a 9 or 10 foot lane is not share-able because they can visualize it. I find that most motorists pass safely without comment when I take a narrow lane.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;As Mighk says, that perception does change as the lane width increases. A lot of roads seem to have that ambiguous width that motorists visualize as share-able, but would be unsafe or uncomfortable for us to share.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;It&#039;s helpful to recognize that we do have a right to take that lane! To borrow from a recent FBA blog post (http://flabicycle.blogspot.com/) “I&#039;m good enough, I&#039;m smart enough, and doggone it, I deserve to be passed safely!”&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;:-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Mighk! Great explanation. The illustrations are very helpful too.</p>
<p>Regardless of whether or not they WANT to share it, a higher percentage of motorists recognize that a 9 or 10 foot lane is not share-able because they can visualize it. I find that most motorists pass safely without comment when I take a narrow lane.</p>
<p>As Mighk says, that perception does change as the lane width increases. A lot of roads seem to have that ambiguous width that motorists visualize as share-able, but would be unsafe or uncomfortable for us to share.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s helpful to recognize that we do have a right to take that lane! To borrow from a recent FBA blog post (<a href="http://flabicycle.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://flabicycle.blogspot.com/</a>) “I&#8217;m good enough, I&#8217;m smart enough, and doggone it, I deserve to be passed safely!”</p>
<p> <img src='http://mighkwilson.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donny</title>
		<link>http://mighkwilson.com/2007/11/how-wide-is-a-share-able-lane/comment-page-1/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>Donny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 16:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commuteorlando.com/themetester/2007/11/how-wide-is-a-share-able-lane/#comment-47</guid>
		<description>Good analysis, but I have to say I disagree with your final comments.  Most motorists don&#039;t see a lane as share-able at all and believe that bicycles don&#039;t have a right to use the road in the first place.  Even when there is a bike lane. &gt;_&lt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good analysis, but I have to say I disagree with your final comments.  Most motorists don&#8217;t see a lane as share-able at all and believe that bicycles don&#8217;t have a right to use the road in the first place.  Even when there is a bike lane. >_<</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
